Hello friends and other interested parties. I apologize for the long absence, but I’m happy to report that continued good health means a full return to life with all of its attendant responsibilities and time-sucks. :)
So as not to bury the lede, I remain in good health — although I’m undergoing follow-up tests this week so I’m hoping that remains the case as this is the longest I’ve gone (six months) without detailed testing.
The other big news is that my beloved Dr. BB — Bart Barlogie — has retired. So I’m about to undergo my first serious round of follow-up with a new “quarterback”. Thus, I find myself back in Little Rock, with some familiar faces amongst the administration but a new doctor, Frits Van Rhee. I’ll call him FVR to save time rather than anonymity. :)
The decision of whom to see was not an easy one; there are many specialists closer to home (and after a travel snafu that had me driving five hours from Dallas to Little Rock yesterday, some of them seem more appealing) but I’m sorry so say that Total Therapy is not the standard of care for this disease, as science looks to new drugs to provide an easier path to long-term remission. Never mind that I’m sitting here more than 10 years from diagnosis with an expectation that the disease isn’t coming back…
At any rate, it was important to me that I be seen be a doctor who has treated people with Total Therapy and has experience following up patients that have undergone the treatment. As an example, at some point (possibly even now) I need to be more concerned about the possibility of leukemia from the chemotherapy than I need to be about my myeloma returning. So this narrowed it down to a handful of doctors across the country.
I know that BB holds FVR in high regard, and I’d been on a panel several years ago with FVR. He’s probably treated more patients with Total Therapy than any doctor currently practicing, now what BB has retired. Plus returning to UAMS also allows me to track my progress along with the hundreds of total therapy patients (and more specifically the dozens (?) that were in my specific cohort). The value in this is that I can see if anybody has relapsed rather down the curve than me. If, as I hope is the case, 95% or more of people once they reach the 10-year mark remain in remission several years later, it looks better and better for my own long-term outcome.
They’re calling me soon, as I have to re-enroll here so it’s like I’m a new patient. Maybe not the most efficient administrative approach but as long as they kept my stem cells, I’m happy with these nice folks.
I will say that I forgot how sleepy this town can be. Going to New York for follow-up the past three years has been a bit different. I got into town at 7:30 and could barely find a restaurant that was open. God wants people to eat on Sundays, too!! :)
Today I have blood work plus a bunch of tests. Bone marrow is tomorrow. PET and other tests are Wednesday, and the doctor is Thursday. More to come.
I am profoundly thankful for my good health and for BB. For those following along who were also patients of his, I should say that I have been in touch and he seems to be doing well. Selfishly, I wish he was practicing but he’s 78 now, I think, and has earned a rest.